Fight Club: Vladimir Putin Continues to Slay the New World Order Intellectually

This article is published specifically for one of my readers, Wolf, who I hope will not miss it. ~J  🙂

Vladimir Putin must have been very proud of himself by now because New World Order agents have already published countless anti-Putin books over the past three years or so.


…by Jonas E. Alexis

Putin must have been very proud of himself by now because New World Order agents have already published countless anti-Putin books over the past three years or so. There seems to be an anti-Putin industry where NWO gangsters can publish basically telepathic things about Putin.

NWO agents simply cannot understand how this man continues to rise above the ashes when they have done everything in their power to slander him and subvert or invert or pervert what he has said.

Listen to some of those book titles: Putinism: Russia and Its Future with the West, by Walter Laqueur (2015); Putinism: The Ideology (2013), by Anne Applebaum; Putinism: The Slow Rise of a Radical Right Regime in Russia (2013), by Marcel H. Van Herpen; The New Tsar: The Rise and Reign of Vladimir Putin (2015), by Steven Lee Myers; Winter Is Coming: Why Vladimir Putin and the Enemies of the Free World Must Be Stopped (2015), by Garry Kasparov; The Man Without a Face: The Unlikely Rise of Vladimir Putin (2013), by Masha Gessen; Putin’s Kleptocracy: Who Owns Russia?(2015), Karen Dawisha; Putin’s Wars: The Rise of Russia’s New Imperialism (2014), Marcel H. Van Herpen; The New Cold War: Putin’s Russia and the Threat to the West (2014), Edward Lucas; The Russia-China Axis: The New Cold War and America’s Crisis of Leadership (2014), Douglas E. Schoen and Melik Kaylan; The Evolution Of Putinism: Russia in Transition 1985-2015 (2015), by Glenn-Iain Steinback; Putin and Putinism (2015), edited by Ronald J. Hill and Ottorino Cappelli; Putin’s Propaganda Machine: Soft Power and Russian Foreign Policy, by Marcel H. Van Herpen. The list is almost endless.

We have certainly lost something in the intellectual culture. It used to be that whenever a person purports to write a scholarly or rigorous work, he has to present serious evidence. If he is writing a philosophical treatise, he has no choice but to pledge allegiance to deductive arguments and practical reason.

You simply cannot read Plato’s Republic or Aristotle’s Metaphysics without realizing that those men are dealing with heavy stuff. Those works are so heavy that they have stood the test of time. (For example, Aristotle posited the claim that money is sterile intercourse. The New World Order ignored that warning and we ended up with a crash market in 2008.)

You cannot read R. M. Douglas’s Orderly and Humane: The Expulsion of the Germans after the Second World War or Giles MacDonogh’s After the Reich: The Brutal History of the Allied Occupation or Alfred-Maurice de Zayas’ A Terrible Revenge: The Ethnic Cleansing of the East European Germans without coming to terms with the fact that those people went to the archives and searched for primary sources to back up their claims.

You cannot read David Irving’s Hitler’s War or Churchill’s War without giving the man credit for digging into forbidden territories, namely, archival documents. You may disagree with some of his conclusions, but a serious person should appreciate the work of people who are challenging what Irving calls “the traditional enemy of the truth.” “The conformist historian,” says Irving, “don’t like me because they just rely on second-hand sources or third hand sources, which you can get away with…It has an incestuous quality.”

For example, when asked the question, “What did Adolf Hitler know about the Holocaust?,” conformist historians, says Irving, have never been able to produce serious evidence. “They have been quoting each other like dogs running around in a circle,” declares Irving, but no one has ever been able to come up with reliable evidence for the so-called Holocaust. These people, Irving concludes, “are not going back to primary sources.”

Contrast that to what is happening to our culture. Now just about any mush-head can write a silly book, get published, and become a New York Times bestseller. It doesn’t matter whether the book will look ridiculous within five or ten years. Truth is not the intended goal. Money and popularity are the criteria for many.[1]

Remember Dan Brown’s The Da Vinci Code? Remember how he literally forged his theories?[2] Remember how he began his book by saying that “All descriptions of artwork, architecture, documents, and secret rituals in this novel are accurate”?

Well, Dan Brown goofed. And this time goofing means screwing people who really thought that “All descriptions and documents” were accurate. People plunked down the money to buy The Da Vinci Code but later realized that Brown tricked them in order to make millions of dollars.[3] It is estimated that Brown made $250 million from The Da Vinci Codealone.

Click Here to continue reading.
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Fight Club: Vladimir Putin Continues to Slay the New World Order Intellectually

  1. TONY LANE says:

    there is one thing that I am sure of, and that is the illuminati or the new world order does not know what to do about Putin, he is more than a protagonist or even their nemesis, these creature’s who have no love have and feel no pain for the suffering that they cause, but there is one thing I am certain of, and that is that they don’t like to be laughed at, and that is just what Putin is doing to them and if anything hurts them it is being laughed at. what else can they write about him it is variations on the same theme, like the interviewer who asked him persistently why does he ride bare chested when hi is trekking on a horse or a bear, and the smile tells you that it is a triviality he is in his own country and why not be close to the elements but the interviewer insists that he is sending a message to his opponents, that I am ready for you. and the smile tells you that if that is the way that you read it, then I am okay with that, so it is like the writers of these books, their books do not sell after a while because they are not impartial, they colour it with their own prejudices, so that it no longer becomes a book only a fantasy. the wise world knows that you cannot trivialise Putin. and yes JEAN you have picked another good item today. hugs-TONY

  2. wolf727 says:

    An excellent article by Jonas E. Alexis! I have not read this before.
    Thank you kindly, Jean, for publishing this article for me and directing it to me for my attention.

    I agree with everything Jonas E. Alexis has written – it rings true with me.

    Reading the article has helped me a lot and put me in better spirits.

    I thank you for that, Jean 🙂 🙂 🙂

    Bless you, Jean, and thanks.

  3. TONY LANE says:

    I did send something about David Irving but accidently deleted it, regarding the supposed holocaust, he did a lot of his research into the prison camps like Dachow and Buchenwald and found that they did not have gas chambers for the extermination of the Jews but they did have delousing units for clothes, the delousing agent was called CYCLON B but many Zionist extremists insisted that this was not true, they must have known that in the UK towards the end of the war and after, we had delousing units for the people who did not have cleaning facilities, one of these units was in London next to the CALEDONIAN ROAD prison, and they also used cyclone B where you put or threw your clothes into a big chamber, and David Irving’s reward for being a good historical researcher was a prison sentence, the same with the American teacher historian Brian Finkelstein who’s parents were also in a prison camps, and they also said that they saw no GAS chambers for people, but many people that they shared the prison with brought some disease’s with them and many prisoners died from it because they had no resistance like the people who came from those outer regions, and has David Irving said this is probably where you got most of the high death figures from, but the establishment was not buying it, and it is amazing how much of this is embedded into people because I lost a Jewish friend of mine about 30 years ago when I mentioned this to him and he went almost insanely hysterical. there is some information the author DAN BROWN who wrote the DA VINCI CODE, and what many people do not know is that this was stolen from two British Historians who’s life’s work it was, and there is an outstanding case against DAN BROWN that is still ongoing for more than the DA VINCI CODE, because he also corrupted the historical records. that’s all I know except I see a picture of Boris Kasparov a brilliant Chess Player probably the greatest of all time, but not much of a writer and a very arrogant man. and there is plenty of good history there, and thanks again for the info jean, hugs–TONY

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s