Leonard Harview responds to Anna von Reitz’ letter to a sheriff

Here’s Leonard’s comment:

harvieux says: Your comment is awaiting moderation.

February 16, 2016 at 6:58 am

The Constitution for the united States of America is not the only reference to our purported supreme law of the land. The Constitution for the united States of America is one of four organic laws. Such facts are even recognized by the USA, Inc. such as In Volume 1 of the United States Code, before Title 1 begins, there is a list of the four Organic Laws of the United States of America. 1). The Declaration of Independence 2). The Articles of Confederation 3). The Northwest Ordinance. 4). The Constitution for the united States of America.

Yes, there is fraud perpetrated into all four of these organic laws of the United States of America which now brings up a maxim of law. “Fraud vitiates all.”

Leonard Frank House of Harview

http://scannedretina.com/2016/02/15/sheriffs-letter-of-support/

On Feb 15, 2016, at 5:34 PM, Anna von Reitz <avannavon@gmail.com> wrote:

Sheriff Palmer and Sheriff Clarke in Oregon have both realized that the “Federal Government” corporation and its for-hire agencies have usurped unlawful jurisdiction, but they may still not realize exactly how or why, so I wrote the following Letter of Support to Sheriff Palmer to make it absolutely clear:

February 15, 2016
Sheriff Glenn E. Palmer
Grant County Sheriff’s Office
205 South Humbolt
Canyon City, Oregon RFD 97820

Dear Sheriff Palmer,

I want to thank and congratulate you on your strong stand in behalf of The Constitution and for honoring the guarantees that both the States of America and the living people are owed.

Although you are currently employed by a “governmental services corporation” that forces you to spend your time and effort on corporate law enforcement activities—- enforcement of “Public Policies” and “code” and “statutory law” and “regulations” instead of enforcing the Organic and Public Law we are all owed—- Sheriff Richard Mack brought this very issue all the way to the US Supreme Court in Mack and Prinz v. USA and it was determined that you have every right to exercise your office in defense of The Constitution.

If anyone tries to intimidate you or tell you that you can’t enforce the Organic Law of this country, you just waive that under their noses.

That said, it must be clearly stated that as things now stand, you are not occupying any Public Office. This isn’t your fault and I am not criticizing you. This circumstance resulted from the units of State and County governments choosing to “incorporate” as franchises of the USA, Inc. back in the 1950’s and 60’s.

When you take a company operating on the land and under the Law of the Land and incorporate it, the resulting corporation then has to operate in the international jurisdiction of the sea and under the international Law of the Sea.

The Constitution is the “Supreme Law of the Land” so far as the Federal Government is concerned, but without an unincorporated County or State organization to access that jurisdiction, you are stuck operating as you now are—- a mere employee of a governmental services corporation, placed between your stated and moral duty to enforce The Constitution and the Organic Law of this country and the demands of those operating the private corporation management for you to do nothing but enforce their edicts and regulations instead.

Mack and Prinz v. USA guarantees your right to enforce The Constitution, but a man cannot ultimately serve two masters.

The move is on to elect men like you to the true Public Office of Sheriff on the Land in restored Counties operating as unincorporated body politics owed absolute control of the land jurisdiction of this country once again. As a peace officer— as opposed to a “law enforcement” officer— you will be able to occupy the vacated Public Office of Sheriff on the Land and hold the highest peace keeping office in America. You will be able to deputize as many men as you need to deputize to guarantee The Constitution and enforce it and the rest of our Public Law. You will be able to commandeer whatever equipment you need.

The De Facto Rule of the Corporations as opposed to the Rule of Law and their usurpation upon our jurisdiction is swiftly coming to a well-deserved and ignominious end, as these organizations are being recognized internationally as the self-interested crime syndicates they have become.

The banks that have been running these “governmental services corporations” as storefronts and misrepresenting them as if these organizations were in fact our lawful government have been caught red-handed in mammoth fraud, unlawful conversion of assets, and enslavement.

From the “Governor” on down, people have knowingly or unknowingly been impersonating lawful Public Officials and appearing to act in our lawful Public Offices, while in fact occupying private corporate offices instead. Many of them have taken secretive advantage of the resulting lack of accountability to plunder our country and our people. Those who have abused our trust and used these similarly named private offices as a means to abuse the power of Public Offices for private gain and purposes of plunder are guilty of terrible crimes. They will be prosecuted accordingly.

Please try to inform your fellow-Sheriffs of the facts so that no more of them fall into the trap of obeying unlawful and immoral orders. The Nuremburg Tribunal has been reopened to serve those who, like Sheriff Ward, continue to follow orders that are: (1) not issued by anyone holding valid Public Office; (2) violate the Organic and Public Law of this country; (3) result in harming innocent people and their public and private property interests.

Judge Anna Maria Riezinger

c/o Box 520994

Big Lake, Alaska RFD 99652

***Please, take the time to add your voices. Send your letters and cards of support to Sheriff Palmer at the address above. He has been under a lot of pressure from the criminals operating the Federal Corporation and its “Oregon” franchise to stand down from his support of the actual Public Law of this country. He needs your support and he needs to know why he is right and why those criticizing him are wrong.***

Advertisements
This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Leonard Harview responds to Anna von Reitz’ letter to a sheriff

  1. Deborah says:

    SHERIFF CLARKE: ABOLISH BLM; FED GOV’T SHOULDN’T OWN LAND OUTSIDE D.C; PEOPLE HAVE TO STAND UP
    Published on Feb 13, 2016
    “How can you claim to be … a believer in the Constitution, … and not be on the side of the Hammonds?” If David Clarke were running for President, I’d resume voting.

  2. Spencer says:

    This response by the Constitutional Sheriff is clear, concise and lays the ground work for the way forward. I am glad to see that he is prepared. This is the template. Go forth and conquer. I will be working my way towards getting in touch with Sheriff Joe Arpaio, Sheriff of Maricopa County, and will see where he stands on this. I’ll report back here on my progress along the way.

  3. Just Me says:

    You know that “judge Anna” isn’t really a judge, right? It’s just a fake title she’s given herself to enhance her credibility.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s