Bidding on Planet’s Future, Activists Disrupt Fossil Fuel Auction in Utah

Campaigners say they will continue to protest until federal government stops selling off public lands, keeps oil and gas ‘in the ground’

Activists calling for the federal government to keep fossil fuels "in the ground" were booted from an oil and gas lease auction in Salt Lake City on Tuesday. (Photo: Taylor McKinnon/ Center for Biological Diversity)

Activists calling for the federal government to keep fossil fuels “in the ground” were booted from an oil and gas lease auction in Salt Lake City on Tuesday. (Photo: Taylor McKinnon/ Center for Biological Diversity)

More than 100 climate activists disrupted the Bureau of Land Management’s oil and gas lease auction in Salt Lake City on Tuesday, sending a powerful warning to the Obama administration that until the climate impacts of such sales are considered, the protests will not relent.

“It’s simple,” said Tim Ream, climate and energy campaign director for the activist group WildEarth Guardians. “The climate impacts of the federal oil and gas program have never been studied. We are going to keep on protesting every single oil and gas lease sale until Obama agrees to that study and puts a timeout on oil and gas just like he did for coal,” Ream added, referencing last month’s White House announcement.

At the so-called “climate auction,” industries were bidding on more than 45,000 acres of publicly owned oil and gas in Utah, which is estimated to hold as much as 1.87 million tons of potential greenhouse gas pollution.

A number of protesters waving mock bidder paddles—which were plastered with images of children, representing those who will be most impacted by climate change—were reportedly kicked out for singing, which temporarily disrupted the auction.

Others, including author and environmentalist Terry Tempest Williams, served as a witness while “our public lands, public commons being auctioned off now at $2.00 per acre,” as she wrote on Twitter Tuesday.

In a column on Tuesday, co-founder Bill McKibben lays out what he describes as “the numbers.”

“We have to keep 80 percent of the fossil-fuel reserves that we know about underground,” he writes. “If we don’t—if we dig up the coal and oil and gas and burn them—we will overwhelm the planet’s physical systems, heating the Earth far past the red lines drawn by scientists and governments. It’s not ‘we should do this,’ or ‘we’d be wise to do this.’ Instead it’s simpler: ‘We have to do this.'”

In the U.S., activists have specifically said that ending federal fossil fuel leases on public lands and waters, which would have a significant impact on lowering carbon emissions, could be accomplished through a simple executive action by the president.
[. . . except that executive action is outside the Constitution; inother wrods illegal, and most aren’t aware either of this fact, or that the Federal Government, according to the Constitution, cannot own this land! ~J]

“When we become fully present to what is happening in the world, we see that the decisions we make today will impact those living far in the future,” said Kaitlin Butler, with the Women’s Congress for Future Generations, who took part in Tuesday’s action.

Butler said that the failure of the leasing program to recognize that “climate change is the predominant issue of our time” is a “misuse of science that fails to ensure clean air, unpolluted waters, biodiversity, human health—a habitable Earth.”

This spring, the climate movement is calling for an escalated mobilization.

“I don’t know if we’re going to win this fight in time,” McKibben writes. “But I do know we’re now fighting on every front. And the most important one is the simplest: We can, and we must, and we will keep that coal and gas and oil underground.”

Later, it was reported that Williams, or Bidder 19, had “purchased” several oil and gas parcels in Grand County.The demonstration is part of a growing “Keep It In the Ground” movement that is calling on leaders to heed the warnings from scientists, and evidenced by an increasingly warmer planet, that we must immediately stop the burning of fossil fuels if we hope to stave off the worst impacts of climate change.

This entry was posted in Uncategorized. Bookmark the permalink.

3 Responses to Bidding on Planet’s Future, Activists Disrupt Fossil Fuel Auction in Utah

  1. enki says:

    If you don’t lawfully own it….

    You can’t lawfully sell it…..

    The “buyer” will not lawfully own it.

  2. Hildegard says:

    Donald Trump gets it wrong, wrong, wrong

    A quote I saw recently but can’t find at the moment so I’m paraphrasing;
    “Having someone protect your rights by violating your rights is like hiring a bodyguard to beat you up randomly.”

  3. lecox says:

    I don’t know who all these “activists” really are, but this is a Public Relations event that is probably aimed at showing people how they are supposed to behave if they don’t like something the BLM or some other government agency is doing.
    I was “there” when the “ecology movement” got started in 1967. At least that’s the year I recall attending a “teach-in” at the University of Michigan. The movement was amazingly effective in getting “environmental protection” legislation passed at the federal level. There were always lots of scientists and academic types connected with this movement, and it became obvious they were getting a lot of support from somewhere.
    The corporations-versus-environmentalists meme was a very useful one for the powers that be. Probably some of them even thought conservation was a good idea. The issue gave a lot of people something to get upset over that they couldn’t really do anything about and that would keep them distracted from more important concerns. It also fostered popular support for the idea of entirely moving people out of certain areas. As we have seen, the ecological reasons for this program are much more elusive than the profit-motivated reasons that have often been uncovered by careful researchers.
    The environmental movement always had a problem because it treated Man as just another animal. Thus, arguments about freedoms and property rights could be brushed aside. If the overall struggle ever simplifies itself down to one between those who prefer spiritual freedom and those who don’t (which I believe is what it basically is) then “environmentalists” will finally have to face the choice of siding with the totalitarians or broadening their viewpoint to incorporate spiritual data into their planning.
    In some ways, it is this spiritual data more than any other that ignorance of leaves the criminals in control.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s